Va savoir (2001)

6 06 2008

My first Rivette experience and I liked it a great deal. There’s more than enough elements to turn me off, such as the abundance of dialogue and the self-consciously “high-brow” attitude, but I think that Rivette rises above all of that. In a way, it is actually not completely unlike Assayas’ Late August, Early September. They share the same intellectual, coffee-talk type of characters who seem to never have to work. Again though, Rivette is above this and fleshes his characters out in spite of their over-talkative nature, not because of it.

Camille, an itinerant actress, and her theater director boyfriend, Ugo reach a rough patch in their relationship – artistically and romantically. Their tour stops in Paris, where Camille lived with her one-time lover, Pierre. She goes by for a visit only to find that he has moved on to Sonia. Ugo, on the other hand, is starting new relationships, as opposed to revisiting old ones. While searching for a lost play by Goldoni, he meets the much younger Dominique, whose half-brother is spending time with Sonia but only to snatch her jewels.

The above description does create implications that the film is one of these “full circle” connection stories along the lines of Magnolia, Short Cuts, and so on. Thankfully, it is not. Instead, the drama derives from the surrounding of our two principle characters, Camille and Ugo. The film is light enough in tone (in a good way) that the connections are never dramatic revelations, but rather unobtrusive progressions in certain relationships. Needless to say, it is a joy to watch the film unfold not only because the characters are portrayed so honestly but also because they are realized perfectly. To avoid a gush-fest, I’ll just say that Jeanne Balibar is definitely one of the best performers working in France right now, and leave it at that.

The cinematography, one of my biggest concern with Rivette, is actually quite fantastic. It’s not revolutionary or anything, but it is very impressive and yet somehow subdued. The very formal camera work does evoke somewhat of an Antonioni feel, though of course there is far too much dialogue in this film to make a straightforward comparison. Perhaps one could say it’s a bit like a screwball comedy envisioned by Antonioni. In fact, yeah that sounds quite good. It points out the two greatest strengths in Rivette’s characterization: honest and truthful even if it means being a little silly.

Advertisements

Actions

Information

4 responses

6 06 2008
Daniel

Glad you are finally entering into the wide, wonderful world of Rivette! This was my first Rivette too, long, long before I clicked with the director. It’s not exactly one of those auteur nexus films, which show you all that they like to deal with and help explain the stranger or “lesser” films. I think this is in fact one of those latter films, so I’ll be curious what you think of it after you see more canonical films by the director.

By the way, what do you mean by: “The cinematography, one of my biggest concern with Rivette, is actually quite fantastic”?

And the digs against dialog, why! Dialog can be cinematic, look at Rohmer, or Renoir or Hawks or any number of other directors whose key pleasures are the dialog!

6 06 2008
Jake Savage

RE: The cinematography – I was a bit concerned that he wouldn’t be visually, I dunno, out-there? It’s a good thing: the film far exceeded my visual expectations.

RE: dialog – One spells it as “dialog” not “dialogue.” I feel silly if this is so, but anyway I think the talking was alright in this case. On the other hand, Rohmer? Hawks? No thank you sir. It’ll be a long time before I seen anything else by those two, though I have been thinking about giving Rohmer a second chance. I saw My Night at Maud’s about a year and I thought it was laughably bad. Renoir, on the other hand, is definitely someone I like. I’ve seen La bete humaine and reviewed it here, as well as Boudu , which I have to write/type about. Both were excellent.

Uh anyway, Rivette. I think I’ll be seeing Love on the Ground next. I finished La belle noiseuse this morning. I’ll have something up for that soon.

7 06 2008
domino harvey

This was my first Rivette film too– though ultimately it’s probably my least-favorite of his films that I’ve seen, so nowhere to go but up.

9 06 2008
Michael Kerpan

I have yet to see a Rivette film that I did not find rewarding. I’ve seen virtually everything — and found everything interesting. With the demise of Shohei Imamura, Rivette took over as my favorite “senior director”.

Va savoir is not one of my very top favorite Rivette films — but it is one I like very much.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: